<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TLS for HTTP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/</link>
	<description>patches 'n hacks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Signal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; HTTP et TLS, la RFC méconnue&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>Signal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; HTTP et TLS, la RFC méconnue&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>[...] semblerait que ce soit prévu pour la version 3 de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] semblerait que ce soit prévu pour la version 3 de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kill Bill</title>
		<link>http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Kill Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Firefox 2 has lready support RFC 3546. Check here,

http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2

mozilla people planed TLS NSI support . After knowing IE7 would support this, they accelerated they development and implemented in NSS v3.11 (initially they planed this support in NSS v3,12). Check here,

http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap

They plan to support RFC 2817 with firefox v3.


On the server side, apache v2.2 has built-in support for RFC 2817. The third-party module, mod_gnutls, adds RFC 3546 support to both apache v2.0 and apache v2.2. Check here,

http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_gnutls/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2 has lready support RFC 3546. Check here,</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2" rel="nofollow">http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2</a></p>
<p>mozilla people planed TLS NSI support . After knowing IE7 would support this, they accelerated they development and implemented in NSS v3.11 (initially they planed this support in NSS v3,12). Check here,</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap</a></p>
<p>They plan to support RFC 2817 with firefox v3.</p>
<p>On the server side, apache v2.2 has built-in support for RFC 2817. The third-party module, mod_gnutls, adds RFC 3546 support to both apache v2.0 and apache v2.2. Check here,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_gnutls/" rel="nofollow">http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_gnutls/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kill Bill</title>
		<link>http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Kill Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Firefox 2 has lready support RFC 3546. Check here,

    http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2

mozilla people planed TLS NSI support . After knowing IE7 would support this, they accelerated they development and implemented in NSS v3.11 (initially they planed this support in NSS v3,12). Check here,

    http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap

They plan to support RFC 2817 with firefox v3.

You are right about apache 2.2 support both RFCs though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2 has lready support RFC 3546. Check here,</p>
<p>    <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2" rel="nofollow">http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2</a></p>
<p>mozilla people planed TLS NSI support . After knowing IE7 would support this, they accelerated they development and implemented in NSS v3.11 (initially they planed this support in NSS v3,12). Check here,</p>
<p>    <a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap</a></p>
<p>They plan to support RFC 2817 with firefox v3.</p>
<p>You are right about apache 2.2 support both RFCs though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kill Bill</title>
		<link>http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Kill Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patchlog.com/security/tls-for-http/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Firefox 2 has lready support RFC 3546. Check here,

http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2


mozilla people planed TLS NSI support . After knowing IE7 would support this, they accelerated they development and implemented in NSS v3.11 (initially they planed this support in NSS v3,12). Check here,

http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap


They plan to support RFC 2817 with firefox v3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2 has lready support RFC 3546. Check here,</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2" rel="nofollow">http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Security_in_Firefox_2</a></p>
<p>mozilla people planed TLS NSI support . After knowing IE7 would support this, they accelerated they development and implemented in NSS v3.11 (initially they planed this support in NSS v3,12). Check here,</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Roadmap</a></p>
<p>They plan to support RFC 2817 with firefox v3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
